Useful naming advice explains a decision. It should give a group something to discuss, rather than surround a random suggestion with confident-sounding claims.
What we publish and why
Our guides focus on practical naming decisions: how a name sounds, what it suggests, who might feel at home under it, and how it works in a game interface. A page should offer a specific angle or useful explanation beyond a bare string of candidates. We avoid presenting word count, page count, or machine-generated variation as evidence of quality.
Armindo is responsible for the publication. We do not invent a panel of linguists, professional guild consultants, player survey participants, or credentials to make the site sound more established. Personal editorial judgments are presented as judgments. A style recommendation is not a measured fact about every player or every language community.
AI assistance with clear boundaries
AI-assisted drafting is part of the production of vocabulary, examples, and explanatory copy. The site’s original structured material and local generation rules are the basis of the published tools. We do not describe an automated result as a personal experience or pretend that a live human or live language model is reviewing your individual brief.
AI assistance can produce mistakes, repeated phrasing, or an unintended association. We aim to reduce those problems through structured attributes, explicit limits, and correction. We do not promise that every candidate has been individually checked by a professional translator or specialist. If an unfamiliar expression matters, consult reliable language sources and people familiar with the context.
Sources, facts, and fictional interpretation
When factual policy statements need support, we prefer the relevant organization’s official documentation. Game-specific facts should be checked against current official materials rather than inferred from a familiar title. External links identify useful references; they do not imply endorsement or an ongoing commercial relationship.
Name meanings and symbolism are often creative readings written for a fictional guild. We distinguish them from established etymology or a claim about a real culture. We do not invent historical authorities, quotations, scientific studies, or trademark searches. A name that feels “ancient” is an aesthetic impression until reliable evidence supports a historical statement.
Bilingual publication and corrections
The English and Japanese editions should be useful in their own right. We favor natural wording and local naming considerations over a mechanical word-for-word match. Policy pages are intended to describe the same service practices in both languages. A discrepancy should be corrected rather than used to create a different promise for one audience.
Send a correction to scharrarmindo@gmail.com with the page, the passage or generated name, the reason for concern, and a source where available. We consider factual mistakes, unclear wording, accessibility barriers, and harmful unintended meanings. Corrections may change a vocabulary entry, explanation, or article. Dates should indicate a real publication or relevant revision, not an invented claim of daily research.
Independence and commercial relationships
No advertising or affiliate program is active at launch. If a future commercial arrangement affects a recommendation or placement, it must be disclosed where readers can understand it. Paid placement must not masquerade as an editorial conclusion, and an advertiser must not be allowed to turn a tool’s naming score into an undisclosed promotion.
The site’s policy and content work can support an honest publishing operation, but it cannot guarantee Google indexing, search placement, or AdSense acceptance. Those decisions are made by external systems under their own criteria. Last updated: October 23, 2026.
